Sure.... What's the homework?

dipshits

Apparently a challenger to this miracle discovery. While the statement could be considered a valid accusation, it is yet an incomplete sentence and therefore requires further elaboration to properly convey the message.
The pluralization of this statement of "dipshit" first requires examining the root of the compound word. Dip can mean a food substance used to garnish snacks, while it can also be the act of placing the snack in a food substance and then withdrawing with a healthy portion of the said garnishing remaining on the snack for the feasting pleasure of the participant.
While the word shit is typically reserved for slang purposes, it has been regarded as a modern household term with a wide assortment of applications. First and foremost, it can be used synonymously with the word "feces." Additionally, it can be used to quite colorfully express one's disliking for the current situation, excessive excitement, or other arbitrary vocalization of general panic.
Considering the options before us, it is logical that the comment above was not suggesting we consume a pluralization of feces covered in a food substance garnishing. That would make no real sense at all considering that popular science has so far proved that no amount of food garnishing can mask the putrid taste of feces in just about all varieties.
Furthermore, the act of dipping while vocalizing general panic would compromise the irrationality of panic in order to maintain enough focus to dip simultaneously. It is clear that any one versed in science would not have suggested this experiment.
We are then left with the assumption that the commenter above is suggesting we enact the dipping of many shits into food garnishing with the purpose of disproving the U=WTF theory of recent discovery. Since this has not yet been lab tested, we will, for the purpose of discovery, perform the requested act and report the findings here.

We solute you, fellow scientist. Your remarks will undoubtedly change the face of science as we know it.

Jigsaw, is there going to be another saw movie?

Difficult to say. In attempt to correlate the popular Horror/drama catalog of the "Saw" movies with the ground breaking discovery of the U=WTF theory, I have found little compatible details between the two and, thus, cannot use the details of either to firmly conclude whether or not there will be another sequel to the popular movie series.
However, if there is question on the details that do align, it will comfort the observer to know that WTF also applies to the latest installment of the aforementioned "Saw" series. Considering all things, the latest installment fails to capture the shock and effectiveness of the original installment, by means of supplementing the lack of mind twisting shock with the much easier gratuitous gore and violence shock that many sub-par horror movies resort to in order to satisfy the general public.
Much the same, the universe, as we know it, supplies much in line of unanswerable and unfulfilled details pertaining to the subject, and therefore can be directly related to the comparison of the "Saw" series.

While it may be an unsatisfactory answer, the least we can say is that the demand for cheap, gory films is enough to ensure the longevity of the "Saw" series and can safely be projected that we will have yet another installment of the popular horror series to suffer through. At the very least, we will be provided a spin off.

As for an update on the feces experiment: No, we have not yet disproved the U=WTF theory through the copious dipping of feces into dips of many varieties. We will report any breakthroughs, though.

We thank you for your response.